|
1
|
- Administrative Unit Profiles Workshop 2007/2008
|
|
2
|
- Is a publicly accessible online data management system composed of
relational databases.
- Has academic and administrative unit profiles, course information, and
faculty teaching credentials.
- Documents annual assessment reporting by unit to support the
University’s accountability for assessment.
|
|
3
|
- All information in UAOPS except certain management reports can be viewed
without a password.
- The UAOPS Homepage has clearly marked read-only sections where all
information can be viewed.
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- Regional and program specific accrediting organizations.
- UA faculty, staff and administrators such as the Provost and faculty
advisors
- Students, prospective students and their families.
|
|
7
|
- Mandated by SACS Principles of Accreditation 3.3.1
|
|
8
|
- Overall, there was a significant improvement in the administrative unit
profiles last year.
- The most common areas needing improvement were:
- Each expected outcome should be a significant component of the unit’s
mission.
- Some expected outcomes contained multiple expectations, each needing
assessment.
- Many unit profiles lacked summaries of assessment methods and/or
results, a data summary, or they were not clearly worded.
- Not following the 1 to 1 to 1 correspondence rule.
|
|
9
|
- The University of Alabama Mission
- The Division’s Mission Statement
- The Unit’s Mission Statement
|
|
10
|
- The Unit Profile mission statement should be the same as that shown on
the administrative unit website.
- The Unit Profile should represent the most important features of the
more detailed Administrative Unit Strategic Plan.
- There should be congruency
between the UAOPS Unit Profile and any assessment plans prepared for the
Administrative Unit.
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
- Archived unit profiles from 2005 and 2006 can be viewed by selecting the
year.
- This year, unit profiles will be completed on a prospective basis
- The outcomes for last year are populated into the grid for 2007/2008,
but the remaining areas are blank
|
|
13
|
- The 2007/2008 outcomes in column 1 should be edited, changed, or deleted
as needed now.
- The assessment methods planned
for those outcomes should be described in column 2 entitled, “Unit
Methods of Assessment”.
- As results are available, they should be added to column 3, entitled,
“Unit Results of Assessment”. Please
include a data summary.
- When the assessment results have been reviewed and formally discussed by
staff and management, and changes and improvements have been implemented,
that information should be summarized in column 4. This last step will occur after the
spring semester.
- The deadline for completion of administrative unit profiles is June 1,
2008. This date was chosen to allow most units to finalize the unit
profile along with their annual report.
- Unit Profiles will be evaluated after June 1 and archived August 20,
2008. An evaluation report will
be emailed to each unit.
|
|
14
|
- To answer the question,
- How well is the unit providing services to its individual group of
clients?
|
|
15
|
- Consider how the unit’s mission statement reflects one or more of the
primary components of UA’s mission
statement.
- Establish the administrative unit’s mission statement, listing all
services provided.
- Formulate the administrative unit’s expected outcomes based on the
services listed in the unit’s mission statement.
- Identify unit methods of assessment and criteria for success
- Conduct assessment activities.
- Discuss and document use of results for service improvements.
-
Source: Nichols and
Nichols, 2005
|
|
16
|
- The University of Alabama 2006/2007 FACTBOOK, page 3
- http://bama.ua.edu/~oir/factbook/
|
|
17
|
- May include a philosophical statement of purpose.
- Needs to include a list of services provided by the unit.
- Needs to be revisited at least annually to determine if any services
have been added or are no longer provided.
|
|
18
|
- Look at the services listed in the unit mission statement of unit. Assessment should seek these answers:
- What is the skill/knowledge/benefit that we want our clients to receive
from the current services offered?
- Are the students or other clients learning/benefiting from the current
services offered?
- What is the level of satisfaction of our clients with current services?
|
|
19
|
- Outcomes should focus on currently existing services as described in the
unit mission statement.
- They should not focus on administrative planning activities that are
future focused.
- (Continued)
|
|
20
|
- If the only answer to the assessment question is,
- “yes, they did it”,
- or,
- “no, they didn’t do it”,
- then, the service is probably a planned one, not a current one.
|
|
21
|
- The Unit’s staff :
- Reviews services as described in the mission statement.
- Creates a long list of objectives/outcomes related to those services.
- From that list, staff selects outcomes to be assessed during upcoming
assessment cycle.
|
|
22
|
- Some experts recommend 5 to 8 expected outcome statements
- Use of only 1 outcome statement could raise the question of whether unit
takes assessment seriously.
- If there are many more than 5 to 8, there will be time for little else.
|
|
23
|
- Better: Once grades are received,
the registrar's office will decrease the time for posting of grades
- by _____.
- Good: Registrar’s office wants to
improve time for posting grades to final transcripts.
|
|
24
|
- (Name of Service)
- (Name of Unit) will
|
|
25
|
- (Service) will increase overall client satisfaction rating to an average score of 4.3 out of a
possible 6.0.
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
- Each Expected Outcome must be assessed.
- Methods and results that include data should be clearly summarized.
- Choose multiple methods for assessment, both direct and indirect
whenever possible or appropriate.
- Direct measures directly measure the outcome; indirect measures do not
directly measure the outcome.
|
|
28
|
- Volume of activity such as number of persons served.
- Levels of efficiency such as the average time for response.
- Measures of quality such as average errors per audit
|
|
29
|
- Informal Method of Assessment Can Become a Formal Method of Assessment
- Informal observation or report of service not working as it should, such
as a student event.
- Discussion at a staff meeting/brainstorming ways to correct problem or
use different approach.
- Staff members formulate a desired outcome such as, “Students will enjoy
the night activities planned by Campus Events”.
- Source: Nichols and Nichols,
2005
|
|
30
|
- Staff develops method (a rubric) to assess this outcome.
- A rubric is a table that lists specific traits that apply to the skill
being taught and defines quality levels for each trait
- Makes list of several factors expected to be seen if students are
enjoying an event such as:
- showing an interest,
- smiling,
- attending event,
- expressing gratitude, and
- specific comments made by students
|
|
31
|
- Develop checklist or scoring rubric for evaluating the campus event
using above factors.
- Define a threshold for success:
For example, an overall average score of 3.6 will be received by
all events, with no individual event scoring less than 2.5.
- Have more than one staff member attend
future events and uses the scoring rubric for recording observations of
student enjoyment of the event and any comments made.
|
|
32
|
- Results are tabulated:
- After each event, at least 2 staff members tabulate their individual
ratings of student enjoyment of the event and list any specific comments
made by students.
- Overall scores are tabulated for each event based on the staff members
ratings.
|
|
33
|
- Improvements/Changes (Column 4)
are planned
- Assessment results data are discussed at staff meeting and/or annual
retreat
- Improvements/Changes based on assessment data are implemented
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
- Each unit has a representative or “contact” with a username and
password. The contact can update
or upload information.
- Unit Profile updates are entered directly into the text display area.
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
- UAOPS users and department heads should use care that no protected
individual information is placed on the website.
- Examples include social security numbers, birthdates, data on
identifiable students, or other protected information.
|
|
39
|
- The University of Alabama website has Family Educational Rights and
Privacy Act (FERPA) training presentations available.
- FERPA 101 is for UA employees.
- FERPA 102 is for administrators
|
|
40
|
- A list of FAQs relating to use of UAOPS is posted at the UAOPS website.
- The Institutional Research and Assessment staff are available to help at
any time.
|
|
41
|
- Edit and finalize the current 2007/2008 outcomes in column 1 now.
- The assessment methods planned
for those outcomes should be summarized in column 2 entitled, “Unit
Methods of Assessment”.
- As results are available, they should be added to column 3, entitled,
“Unit Results of Assessment”. Include
a data summary.
- When the assessment results have been reviewed and formally discussed by
faculty and management, and curricular changes and improvements have
been implemented, summarize that information in column 4. This last step will occur after the
spring semester.
- The final deadline for completion of everything is the August 20, 2008
archive date. This date was
chosen to allow most units to finalize the unit profile along with their
annual report.
|
|
42
|
- When draft unit profiles are completed, they will be evaluated.
- Feedback reports will be sent to the units again this year.
- Profiles can be edited until the archive date of August 20, even after
the report is submitted.
|
|
43
|
- Each year, in August, the completed unit profiles are archived to
document progress and the University’s commitment to ongoing assessment
at the unit level.
- The feedback reports will be archived along with the unit profile.
|
|
44
|
- This concludes the material on writing unit profiles.
- A short technical demonstration follows if you are interested.
- If you do not need the technical demonstration, you are dismissed.
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
- The SACS-COC 2006 Annual Meeting
- The 2006 Annual Meeting of the Commission on Colleges
- NPEC Assessment Sourcebook, 2005
- Nichols, James O., and Nichols, Karen W., A ROAD MAP FOR IMPROVEMENT OF
STUDENT LEARNING AND SUPPORT SERVICES THROUGH ASSESSMENT, Agathon Press,
NY, 2005.
- “Writing Student Outcomes”, University of Southern California, www.usc.edu,
2006.
- Walvoord, Barbara E., ASSESSMENT CLEAR AND SIMPLE, Jossey-Bass, 2004.
|